🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.